Holocaust Memorials: Lessening or Worsening anti-Semitism in the Netherlands?

While the Netherlands is most often associated with its canals, tulips, and beautiful homes, it is also home to the site where around 75-80,000 Jews were brutally murdered during the Holocaust. Following these atrocities and the turmoil of World War II, specifically the German bombing of Rotterdam, the city was set out to be rebuilt. After its reconstruction, monuments were built and placed around the city, in an attempt to honor the lost Jewish lives during the War. However, with the combination of the Dutch refusing to acknowledge their part in the war, and anti-Semitism still occurring in recent years, it’s questionable whether the structure of current memorials are actually effective. 

The bombing destroyed the heart of Rotterdam. Thus its reconstruction was anticipated to be urban, sleek, and beautiful, and it was. The Netherlands was the “most urbanized part of Europe” (Betsky 12). Citizens were filled with eagerness and fervor regarding the reconstruction effort. At its unveiling in November 1945, Karel Paul van der Mandele said: “Amidst the memorials erected to those who fell in the war, this monument will rise and call us to work. Before us lies the major task of building a new city. Employers and workers must join together and persevere. They must work and create work. May this memorial urge them on and inspire them.” 

Pictured above is the only remaining wall of Transit Warehouse 24. Transit Warehouse 24 serves as a means of remembrance for the Jewish children of Rotterdam who were transported by the Germans during World War II as well as a reminder of all of the atrocities that occurred at the hands of Nazi Germany. However, due to its hidden nature, many Rotterdammers are unaware of this memorial and its meaning. In Ajax, The Dutch, The War: Football in Europe During the Second World War, author Simon Kuper expresses that “few Rotterdammers know that Jews ever lived in their city” (313). This entire city was completely wiped out due to the Nazis, yet a vast majority of their citizens still remain utterly unaware of this memorial and the city’s history. This type of behavior is not uncommon for the Dutch, as during the war they acted similarly.

Many of the Dutch people were deceived into believing that the Nazi rule would not result in the great hardships or brutal atrocities that occurred (Woolf 19). Dutch culture and tradition also placed great emphasis on showing obedience to the law. The combination of these two factors led the Dutch to believe that all they had to do was simply “outlast the German occupation”. The little resistance that did occur by the Dutch was characterized as either passive resistance or non-violent active resistance-essentially showing complacency. The Dutch were practically convinced the impact of Nazi occupation on the Dutch, even the Dutch Jews, would be negligible (Woolf 19). Unfortunately, they were highly mistaken, as the Holocaust resulted in the deaths of ¾ of the entire Dutch Jewish population.

Pictured above is an image of two individual stumbling stones, part of a greater memorial-the Stolpersteine. Each stone represents one Jew that died at the hands of Nazi Germany in the Holocaust. Whereas large memorials such as the National Holocaust Museum in Development represent the scale and brutality of the Holocaust, the intent of the stumbling stones is to place greater emphasis on each individual life lost.Though Holocaust memorials are ubiquitous in Amsterdam, the Stolpersteine is different in the fact that it’s extremely personalized. To some, the unique individualization of this memorial makes these monuments much more poignant than the other more gargantuan, pompous, and impersonal statues. The Stolpersteine delineates a completely new vision of urban memorialization. However, with the constant occurrence of anti-Semitism in Europe, even decades after the end of World War II, it may be that the decentralization of this monument is not doing its cause enough justice. 

In January of 2019, five Feyenoord fans were arrested over blurting out a vile anti-Semitic chant against Ajax on Holocaust Remembrance Day in Rotterdam (Liphshiz 19). As Ajax is a historically Jewish team, fans from rival teams often taunt players as well as supporters of the “Jewish team” with anti-Semitic limericks, phrases, and symbols. This particular chant which circles around the act of burning Jews is known as one of the most offensive insults. A statement given soon after this incident by the Times of Israel announced that this chant was a “recurring problem”, reflecting the proliferation of anti-Semitic sports chants in the Netherlands. Such hate crimes can possibly lead to the recurrence of horrific acts such as those conducted during the Holocaust; these actions must be properly handled before they further develop. Kuper writes about how the racist commentary from the Feyenoord fans was seemingly accepted and habitual, but this never should’ve been normalized in the first place. The normalization of such statements must come to an end, as it only perpetuates further wrongdoings against Jewish people.

 As this was an extremely recent incident, it is evident that anti-Semitism is still unusually prominent in Dutch society. When looking at why such horrid statements are so commonly said, one has to look at the history of anti-Semitism as a whole. Researcher Lebovitch Dahl from the University of Copenhagen articulates that dynamics within the Roman Jesuit institution in the 1880s and 90s made possible the gradual acceptance of anti-Semitism. As there was failure trying to formulate an “anti anti-Semitic response” in the early stages, anti-Semitism was slowly allowed to become part of a widespread culture of their institution, rendering its later rejection virtually impossible (Dahl 14). 

These stumbling stones should have been positioned and structured in a way so that everyone who passed by them was cognizant of the memorials and the true meaning behind them. Every passerby should feel uncomfortable and in turn should be aware of the atrocities that occurred to the Jews during World War 2. Ensuring that every passerby was aware of the memorials and what they represent could possibly help to inform the public and reduce anti-Semitism. However, they remain hidden as “the average passerby will have no idea what the wall and the monument represent” (Kuper 312)  which certainly does not pay successful tribute to the Jews that died in the Holocaust. These invisible memorials in a sense disrespect the memory of the individuals who passed away, rather than enhance it. Though they do a good job of individualizing each memorial, this effort has gone to waste if no one has learned from the past and anti-Semitic acts continue to occur.

Often referred to as Nazi sympathizers, not only for refusing to acknowledge their part in World War II, but also currently, for diminishing blatant acts of anti-Semitism that are continuously occurring nowadays, the Dutch certainly have a ways to go when it comes to accepting and dealing with their catastrophic history. The Dutch have a long history of avoiding their controversial past. Aside from their conduct in World War II, the Netherlands was involved in slave trade and the use of slavery in its former colonies. Though over 500,000 slaves worked for Dutch colonies and slave labor was a massive source of revenue, Dutch children are still not taught about their country’s past in school. The lack of adequate education on this topic in Dutch schools is a major source of limited awareness in this issue among Dutch people today (Cain 12). Additionally, the Dutch have also refused to acknowledge the sacrifices of Indonesians in a war they waged which cost around 300,000 Indonesian lives. Indonesian victims of World War II are also not commemorated. As much as the Dutch try to evade it, their past behavior is far from forgotten. 

Acknowledgement is crucial. The Dutch need to accept their abhorrent history and start to admit their complicity in World War II, as well as continue to offer active support to the Jewish community. By working to start meaningful conversations, educating individuals, and creating memorials that place more emphasis on the greater message rather than simply scattering them around the city for show, the Netherlands can come together to reduce anti-Semitism and create a more welcoming society for all.

References

 Kuper, Simon. Ajax, the Dutch, the War: Football in Europe during the Second World War. Orion, 2011.

Stumbling Stones Zwanenburgwal 260 – Amsterdam – TracesOfWar.com

Apperly, Eliza. “’Stumbling Stones’: a Different Vision of Holocaust Remembrance.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 18 Feb. 2019, .

Aaron Betsky, False Flat: Why Dutch Design is So Good (New York: Phaidon, 2004), ch. 1.

Dahl, David Lebovitch. “Normalization of Antisemitism, 1880–1900: the Case of a Jesuit Community in Rome.” Patterns of Prejudice, vol. 48, no. 1, 2014, pp. 46–66., doi:10.1080/0031322x.2013.874620.

Annemarie Toebosch Director of Dutch and Flemish Studies. “Dutch Memorial Day: Erasing People after Death.” The Conversation, 29 Apr. 2020

Mitchell, Mia, et al. “Whitewashed Slavery Past? The (Lost) Struggle Against Ignorance about the Dutch Slavery History.” Humanity in Action

“Post-War Reconstruction.” Post-War Reconstruction Community Rotterdam, wederopbouwrotterdam.nl/en/articles/post-war-reconstruction.

Liphshiz, Cnnan. “Dutch Soccer Fans Chant Jews Burn Best on Holocaust Remembrance Day .” Times of Israel, Feb. 2019.

“North Holland.” Bezienswaardigheden – TracesOfWar.com

Advertisement

3 thoughts on “Holocaust Memorials: Lessening or Worsening anti-Semitism in the Netherlands?

  1. Hi,
    I like how your intro begins with questioning the memorials that we often just accept without question, and then you support this by giving historical background, while also citing other sources to help support this stance. The way you’ve added more than one photo and described what each photograph means really enhances your paper. By integrating photos into the essay, you’ve given the reader visuals to help better understand what you’re talking about, and also added empathy in a way––since we can see the site you’re referencing and not just hear about it. Your essay, overall, is effective in that you clearly have your own stance on the matter but are able to cohesively back it up with support from sources and historical background knowledge.

    Like

  2. Hi,
    Well done on your paper. It was very thoughtful and provides a strong argument. I think it is very interesting how these monuments resemble the dutch attitude towards acceptance and acknowledgement of their past. I.e its there but its pushed aside, walked over, and meant to fit in the space of the Netherlands rather than loudly claim its own space. I also thought it was particularly interesting the theory you bring up for why anti-semitism is so rampant today. You write “Copenhagen articulates that dynamics within the Roman Jesuit institution in the 1880s and 90s made possible the gradual acceptance of anti-Semitism. As there was failure trying to formulate an “anti anti-Semitic response” in the early stages, anti-Semitism was slowly allowed to become part of a widespread culture of their institution, rendering its later rejection virtually impossible (Dahl 14). ” Moreover, I found this very interesting and educational as I did not know the Roman Jesuit involvement in these matters. Overall, great work. It was a very interesting and compelling read.

    Like

  3. Hi,
    I really enjoyed your paper, we actually wrote about the same topics. The central topic of my paper focused around memorials, and what makes an “honest” memorial. Like yourself, I found issue with the stumbling stones as a somewhat insignificant response to those who were deported and killed. But another key part of the monument I had issue with was how it came into existence. When the Dutch police were instructed to help the Germans locate the Jews, they made extensive lists of addresses and names. Thus because of those lists they were able to pinpoint many of those who had died. I completely agree that the lack of acknowledgement is the real issue here, especially when cities such as Amsterdam profit off of tourism based around the Nazi era monuments. Whether its putting the stumbling stones on the ground where they are less visible, or Ajax as an organization denying having any Jewish members, the lack of acknowledgement and attempts to quietly bury their connections is something that needs to change.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s